A Simple Explanation for a Simple Gesture

Since the reburial of our king on Thursday, I have been distressed and dismayed at the attention given by the unlearned and the unkind to Dr John Ashdown-Hill’s expressions at the service.

10431435_10153693320778942_479467511549137809_n

Have these people never heard of the poet Geoffrey Chaucer, the father of English literature? Are they not familiar with his monk, described in Chaucer’s General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales?

. . . .His eyen stepe, and rollynge in his heed,
That stemed as a forneys of a leed

(His bulging eyes he rolled about, and hot
They gleamed and red, like fire beneath a pot)

Clearly, Dr Ashdown-Hill, overcome during a quiet point of the ceremony with the beauty of Chaucer’s prose as he happened to recall it, was unable to prevent himself from spontaneously acting it out. This often happens to me in public places, and is entirely understandable.

I hope that in light of this explanation, clearly the only tenable one, Dr Ashdown-Hill’s detractors will cease and desist. There is too much valuable work to be done, such as proving the illegitimacy of everyone connected with the ‘Tudor’ dynasty, to be distracted by such minutiae.

Sources:

No sources are necessary. The king is in his final resting place, the birds are chirping, the sun is smiling, and all is right with the world.

Jeff Borden plans to buy a cream-coloured suit just like Dr Ashdown-Hill’s, provided that Mrs Borden approves. 

 

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “A Simple Explanation for a Simple Gesture

  1. I too have invested in a white suit…it brings to mind also the link with Alec Guiness in the film ‘The Man in The White Suit’ which was initially perfect and then fell off in clumps do hope this is not the case with JAH.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Henry I is not the money-spinner that Richard III has proved to be, so perhaps Lady Langley’s interest is purely altrusitic. Proving how smart she is because she found her idol, so now she a profesional Royal Relic Hunter.

        Besides, one cannot write lots of books proving Henry Tudor was illegitimate because of a secret message in the Mona Lisa with Henry I. Just not the oppurtunities for lucrative calumny.

        Like

  2. Being serious here. Very serious. Is John Ashdown-Hill actually a proper historian? I though he was a geneologist by trade, but I mean do serious scholars of this time-acutally take him- well- seriously?
    It seems that Ricardians do, and the media laud him as some kind of expert, but what about the level-headed historical community?

    Like

  3. Being serious here. Very serious. Is John Ashdown-Hill actually a propoer historian? I mean do serious scholars of this time-acutally take him- well- seriously?
    It seems that Ricardians do, and the media laud him as some kind of expert, but what about the level-headed historical community?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s